Cases 31 - 40 of 162
Stroman v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00733
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meades v. May
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Meades
Defendant:
Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. May
as 1:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Michael Broomer
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Woloshin et al
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Natalie S. Woloshin esq., Patrick J. Collins esq., Eric H. Zubrow esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woloshin, et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus, Robert May, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cephas v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Petitioner:
Vernon E. Cephas
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
