Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Wang v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Lorraine Hariton and others
O'Dell v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Nathan Smith and Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Jody Gessow and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Andrew Gessow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bey v. Nassau County Supreme Court et al
as 1:2019cv05422
Defendant:
Nassau County Supreme Court and Hon. Robert McDonald
Plaintiff:
Darnel Powell Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Campanelli et al
as 1:2019cv05304
Defendant:
Mr. Galan, Robin B. Campanelli, Mr. Santiago and others
Plaintiff:
Darnel Powell Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
