Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 21-3679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Frakes, (Current Director) - In thier Individual Capacity, Michelle Wilhelm, (Current Warden) - In their Individual Capacity, The State of Nebraska and others
Nathanial Mack v. Pete Ricketts, et al
as 19-3450
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather Jackson, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II (officially and individually), Richard Cruickshank, Nebraska State Penitentiary Warden (officially and individually), Jeramy Simonsen, Nebraska State Penitentiary Mental Health Practitioner II and former Acting Clinical Sex Offender Programs Manager and C-Sort Vice Chair Person (officially and individually) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathanial Gerald Serrell Mack
Michael Hernandez v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-2169
Petitioner:
Michael Anton Hernandez
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institute
Randy Harms v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-1577
Petitioner:
Randy R. Harms
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correction, Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh Correctional Institution and Nebraska Attorney General John Brunning
Ernest Harper v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-1001
Petitioner:
Ernest C. Harper
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections and Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh Correctional Institution
Herbert Campbell v. Fred Britten, et al
as 12-3258
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Fred Britten, Warden and Robert P. Houston, Director
Donald Patz v. Robert Houston, et al
as 11-1076
Petitioner:
Donald Patz
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden
Wopashitwe Mondo Eyen We Langa v. Robert Houston
as 10-2361
Petitioner:
Wopashitwe Mondo Eyen We Langa, also known as David Rice
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
