Cases 71 - 80 of 114
VENKATASUBRAMANIAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01365
Plaintiff:
SRIKANTH VENKATASUBRAMANIAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PARAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01366
Plaintiff:
ASAF PARAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EVANS v. MUELLER
as 1:2008cv01267
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, Jr.
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BISWAS v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01203
Plaintiff:
SANGITA BISWAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GRAVES v. SCHARFEN et al
as 1:2008cv01152
Plaintiff:
TODD DEAN GRAVES
Defendant:
JONATHAN SCHARFEN, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SOLTANION et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
TALA SOLTANION, TALA SOLTANION and NIMA KAZEMI
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SRINIVASAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
SRIDHARAN SRINIVASAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MAGDIC v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00947
Plaintiff:
DAVOR MAGDIC
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NANDLAL v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00924
Plaintiff:
VINOD N. NANDLAL
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
VERMA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00926
Plaintiff:
USHA KIRAN VERMA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and JONATHAN SCHARFEN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
