Cases 51 - 60 of 152
Mota Lopes v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008mc00021
Petitioner:
Jose E. Mota Lopes
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Robert S. Mueller, III, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Akindele v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00019
Plaintiff:
Wabi Akindele
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Que v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00018
Plaintiff:
Long Que and Yinghong Tan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Gerard Heinauer and others
Milanes et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv02354
Plaintiff:
Virginia Milanes , Omar Miguel Farfan , Manuel Alberto and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff , Emilio Gonzalez , Andrea Quarantillo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Gutin v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00017
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Gutin
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Kevin Gallagher and others
Wang v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2008mc06009
Petitioner:
Zhiwei Wang
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, M. Frances Holmes, Emilio Gonzales and others
Minasazi v. Chertoff et al
as 6:2008mc00012
Petitioner:
Amir Minasazi
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Guzman et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2008cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Guzman and Iglesia Pentecostal Jahova Shalom
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Lee v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2008cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jinyoung Lee
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Iqbal v. Gatner et al
as 1:2008cv00997
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Javed Iqbal
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gatner, Paul E. Novak, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
