Cases 11 - 20 of 61
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13828
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00683
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BERGEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19908
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS BERGEN, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELTRAMI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19827
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS BELTRAMI, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13557
Plaintiff:
KYLE ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13760
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS COLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09796
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS NEAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04961
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS HUNT, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
