Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv08080
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Jones and Solomon Jones, III
Defendant:
L'Oral USA, Inc., L'Oral USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Rahman et al v. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 1:2021cv04299
Plaintiff:
Syed Rahman, Mark Weyermuller and Illinois Rental Property Owners Association
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
