Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WEBER v. FLOWSERVE US INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01549
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WEBER
Defendant:
FLOWSERVE US INC., ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY , BLACKMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIEBERT v. STANDARD INSULATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60587
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY SIEBERT
Defendant:
STANDARD INSULATIONS, INC. , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FURNISH et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68879
Plaintiff:
NELSON FURNISH and ANNA FURNISH
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIAS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80237
Plaintiff:
CARL A. MATHIAS, CARL A. MATHIAS, CARL A. MATHIAS and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TENHOEVE et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv68840
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND TENHOEVE and ROSEANN TENHOEVE
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BERRIER et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90639
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C BERRIER and KATHLEEN E BERRIER
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUH v. A C & S, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv68424
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. RUH
Defendant:
A C & S, INC,, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FINNEY v. ATLAS TURNER, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63254
Plaintiff:
E. FINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
