Torts - Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
John Hernandez et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08813
Plaintiff: John Hernandez, Miranda Sacharin, Fatemeh Koohpai and others
Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bui et al v. Sears, Roebuck, & CO. et al
as 5:2018cv04121
Plaintiff: Jon D. Bui
Defendant: Sears Holding Corp., KCD IP, LLC and Sears, Roebuck, & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matovich et al v. Frigidaire, et al.,
as 3:2017cv03811
Plaintiff: Mark Matovich and USAA
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Company and Frigidaire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CSAA Insurance Exchange v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01290
Plaintiff: CSAA Insurance Exchange
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal North America Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv06884
Plaintiff: Universal North America Insurance Company
Defendant: Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56694
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: W. ALLEN MCDONALD, Christopher T Cain for Objector
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56688
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: GEORGE P. LIACOPOULOS
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56686
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56684
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56666
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: KIMBERLY SMITH and CHRISTINE KNOTT
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?