Cases 71 - 80 of 1,316
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS et al v. THE PEOPLE SEARCHERS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE SEARCHERS, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. WE INFORM, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
WE INFORM, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS et al v. INFOMATICS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
INFOMATICS, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. HIYA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04000
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, EDWIN MALDONADO and others
Defendant:
HIYA, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTICIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. WHITEPAGES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv03998
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
WHITEPAGES, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTICIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. BLACKBAUD, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03993
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
BLACKBAUD, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTICIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RIVERA v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
ROSAURA RIVERA
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, HOOK-SUPERX, INC., ANNE M. SCHWERDT INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MCGIVNEY et al v. SAMS CLUB et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
BARRY MCGIVNEY and MARY MCGIVNEY
Defendant:
SAMS CLUB, SAMS REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, ABC-GHI CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
BAWNIK v. SAM'S CLUB et al
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
TAMAR BAWNIK
Defendant:
SAM'S CLUB, JOHN DOE(S) OWNERS AND LESSORS (#1-#5) (fictitious names, individuals and/or entities), JOHN DOE(S) MAINTENANCE COMPANIES (#6-#10) (fictitious names, individuals and/or entities) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
