Cases 31 - 40 of 132
United States of America v. Bowen et al
as 20-1216
Defendant / Appellant:
Morell David Bowen, Jr. and Olena Bowen
Defendant:
XYZ Corporation, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, John Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Doe v. Trump Corporation
as 20-1706
Defendant / Appellee:
Trump Corporation, Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Loe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mary Moe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
Raj K. Patel
Limtung v. Steven J. Baum, P.C.
as 19-4308
Defendant / Appellee:
EMC Mortgage, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its own capacity and not in its individual or banking capacity, but solely as Trustee for SRMOF II 2011-1 Trust, its successor and assigns, Steven J. Baum, P.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hin Y. Limtung
Kraft v. The City of New York
as 19-4193
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, and indivdually and in their official capacity, William Woes, Unknown New York State Law Enforcement Officers or Agents or Employees, Tom Toes, Unknown New York State Homeland Security and Emergency Service and New York State Police and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Warren R. Kraft
Mudge v. Zugalla
as 18-1298
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Randy A. Mudge
Defendant:
John Doe, representing certain unknown and unnamed employees of the New York State Education Department, Jane Roe, representing certain unknown and unnamed employees of the New York State Education Department, New York State Department of Education and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anne M. Zugalla and Daniel Harder
Harte v. City of New York
as 19-2552
Defendant / Appellee:
William E. Glynn, Obunike Edokwe, M.D., Police Officers John Does and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel J. Harte
Kraft v. The City of New York
as 19-2844
Defendant:
Police Officers, Individually and in their official capacity, Unknown New York State Law Enforcement Officers or Agents or Employees and Unknown officials and employees of the New York State Intelligence Center (NYSIC Fusion Center) and New York State, Unknown Federal Law Enforcement Officers or Agents or Employees of the F.B.I., National Security Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Warren R. Kraft
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Roes, Supervisor police officers of the City of New York, the identity and number of whom is presently unknown, City of New York and John Does, Police Officers and non-uniformed Police Employees of the City of New York, the identity and number of whom is presently unknown individually and in their official capacity
Andres v. Town of Wheatfield
as 19-2370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth Andres, Cindy Krueger, Nicholas Coles and others
Defendant:
Roe Consolidated Holdings, individually and as Successor in interest to Frontier Chemical Process, Inc., Pyrotek Incorporated, individually and as Successor in interest to the Carborundum Company, Saint-Gobain Abrasives Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Republic Services, Inc., individualy and as Successor in interest to Niagara Sanitation Company, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., individually and as Successor in interest to Bell Aircraft Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., individually and as Successor in interest to Bell Aerospace and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Niziol, Samantha Grawe and Mallory Niziol
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
In re: Dental Supplies Antitru
as 19-2193
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dr. Stephen M. Grussmark, Scott T. Ozaki, Kanellos & Kotts and others
Other:
Strategic Data Marketing and Data Marketing Strategic
Defendant / Appellee:
Patterson Companies, Inc., Benco Dental Supply Company and Henry Schein, Inc.
Appellant:
Dr. William Roe
Tygrett v. City of New York
as 19-2167
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen Dimassa, Jennifer Becker, John Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Tygrett
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
