Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Domni v. County of Nassau
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
LEK DOMNI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, Police Officer CHRISTOPHER LAMONICA, Police Officer FREDERICK TRIFARO and others
Eubanks v. Hansell
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUBANKS, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jace Eubanks, deceased and J. E., an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Jamal Eubanks
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, former Commissioner, NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, JOHN AND JANE ROES, said names being fictitious and intended to represent individual attorneys, caseworkers, investigators, youth development specialists, members, agents, servants and/or employees of the New York City Administration for Children's S and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-180
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN CHADWICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, MARKUS FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CATHERINE MCKOY, Individually
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Intervenor:
RAJ K. PATEL
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-181
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
EBIN New York, Inc. v. SIC Enterprise, Inc.
as 23-7444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SIC ENTERPRISE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, (said names being fictitious), JOHN ROE CORPS. 110, (said names being fictitious), TOM TRADING, LLC and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collector's Coffee Inc.
as 23-871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Collector's Coffee Inc., DBA Collectors Cafe
Intervenor:
Los Angeles Dodgers LLC, Doe Individuals 1 through 50, Roe Corporations 1 through 50 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mykalai Kontilai
Roe v. City of New York
as 21-2437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Roe, Jane Roe and Jane Roe 1
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his individual and official capacity as District Attorney of the New York County District Attorney's Office, et al., NYPD and others
Li v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
as 21-2525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hai Dong Li
Defendant / Appellee:
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
Defendant:
Ant Financial Service Group, Jack Yun Ma, Daniel Young Zhang and others
United States Securities and E v. Collector's Coffee Inc.
as 21-2070
Plaintiff:
SDJ Investments, LLC, Adobe Investments, LLC and Darren Sivertsen, Trustee of Sivertsen Family Trust U/A/D
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mykalai Kontilai
Intervenor:
Los Angeles Dodgers LLC, Doe Individuals 1 thorugh 50, Roe Corporations 1 through 50 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Collector's Coffee Inc., DBA Collectors Cafe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
