Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Haynes et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Roberta Haynes and Rick Haynes
Defendant:
M.D. Rhett Roger Smith, M.D. Roger Hal Smith, Rhett Roger Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rogers et al v. Kemron Environmental Services
as 2:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Shade, Eduardo Herrera, Coby Mathews and others
Defendant:
Kemron Environmental Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Summer Paradise et al
as 2:2018cv00158
Petitioner:
Summer Paradise , Roger Comstock , Tracee Comstock and others
Respondent:
Respondent Placeholder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mecham et al v. Luck et al
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Glen Mecham and Diane Mecham
Defendant:
LeRoy Luck, Barbara Luck, Roger Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Avemco Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
O. David Rogers and Donald P. Davies
Defendant:
Avemco Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Avemco Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Donald P. Davies and O. David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Sears Roebuck and Co.,
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Roger Adams
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.,
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330 IRS: Notice & Opportunity for Hearing Before Levy
Rojos-Rogers et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00644
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Rojos-Rogers and Greg P. Rogers
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Aquilex Hydrochem
as 2:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tyler Rogers
Defendant:
Aquilex Hydrochem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodson v. G.Y. Research Institute of Natural Medicine et al
as 2:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Teresa Woodson and Teresa Woodson
Defendant:
G.Y. Research Institute of Natural Medicine, Roger Lewis, Patrick Lloyd Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
