Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ballard v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols, Kathleen Nickol and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kent v. McAfee Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
McAfee Corp., Jon Winkelried, Kathy Willard and others
Rollins v. Metzger et al
as 1:2019cv01255
Respondent:
Warden Dana Metzger and Kathleen Jennings
Petitioner:
Duane Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rollins v. USA
as 1:2016cv00521
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Corey Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
U.S. Bank National Association v. Rollins
as 1:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Rebecca H. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GPNE Corp. v. Rollins Inc.
as 1:2013cv02047
Plaintiff:
GPNE Corp.
Defendant:
Rollins Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rollins v. Ortiz
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rollins
Defendant:
Luis J. Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
