Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Romero-Regalado v. Garland
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
MARIA VANESA ROMERO-REGALADO and ADRIAN SAMUEL ROMERO-REGALADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Romero-Lemus v. Garland
as 24-1046
Petitioner:
BRYAN STEVEN ROMERO-LEMUS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Animal Welfare Institute v. Romero
as 24-776
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE and WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC.
Defendant:
ALEXCY ROMERO, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Fire Island National Seashore, The UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvarez-Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-733
Petitioner:
SINDY FABIOLA ALVAREZ-ORTIZ and MERCY FABIOLA ROMERO-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zavala v. Garland
as 24-496
Petitioner:
SANTOS GLADYS ZAVALA and MARINA ISABEL ZAVALA-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rivera-Figueroa (Andino)
as 24-431
Defendant:
CESAR RIVERA-FIGUEROA, JENHSEN RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL NAVARRO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abrams v. National Park Service et al
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Abrams
Defendant:
National Park Service, Debra Haaland and Alexcy Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Romero Murudumbay v. Garland
as 24-168
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN GEOVANNY ROMERO MURUDUMBAY, ANA GABRIELA CASTRO GAVILANES and CRISTIAN OCTAVIO ROMERO CASTRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
