Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Romero v. Idaho State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kevin F. Romero
Defendant:
Idaho State Correctional Institution and T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald et al v. Continental Steel, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , Jerry Romero , Lon West and others
Defendant:
Continental Steel, Inc. , Tim W. Jackson , Luke Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
McDonald et al v. Idaho Iron, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , Jerry Romero , Vinson Hughes and others
Defendant:
Idaho Iron, Inc. , Jerry L. Wellard and Judy Wellard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McDonald et al v. Idaho Iron, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , Jerry Romero , Vinson Hughes and others
Defendant:
Idaho Iron, Inc. , Jerry L. Wellard and Judy Wellard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Romero v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., April Dawson, Kathleen Niecko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Romero v. Correction Corporation of America
as 1:2008cv00530
Petitioner:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Respondent:
Correction Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Correction Corporation of America
as 1:2008cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Canyon County, State of Idaho
as 1:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Defendant:
Canyon County, State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Idaho Department of Corrections
as 1:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jerry Anthony Romero
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
