Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sebrenda Allen et al v. National General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv09346
Plaintiff:
SEBRENDA ALLEN ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER TRUJILLO, REBECCA HOMMES and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Integon National Insurance Company, Cost-u-Less Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALLEN et al v. National General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv09343
Plaintiff:
SEBRENDA ALLEN ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER TRUJILLO, REBECCA HOMMES and others
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company, Integon National Insurance Company and COST-U-LESS-INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sebrenda Allen et al v. National General Insurance Company et al
as 5:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
Sebrenda Allen, Christopher Trujillo, Rebecca Hommes and others
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company, Integon National Insurance Company, Cost-u-Less Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
as 2:2014at00620
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
as 2:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. McCalla Raymer, LLC
as 2:2013cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King v. McCalla Raymer, LLC
as 2:2013at00686
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ronald King v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
