Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Board of Trustees of Roofers' Health and Welfare Trust fund of Central California, et al v. Universal Coatings Inc
as 1:2021cv00757
Plaintiff:
Roofers Local 27 and Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Trust, National Roofing Industry Supplemental Pension Fund, Central Valley Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Joint Aprrenticeship and Training Trust Fund of Fresno, Madera, Kings, Tulare, Kern, Mono and Inyo Counties and others
Defendant:
Universal Coatings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv01571
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan , National Roofing Industry Supplemental Pension Plan , Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Fryer Roofing Co., Inc. and David Bruce Fryer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc., et al
as 2:2015at00806
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan , National Roofing Industry Supplemental Pension Plan , Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Fryer Roofing Co., Inc. and David Bruce Fryer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc.
as 2:2014cv01765
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan , National Roofing Industry Supplemental Pension Plan , Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Fryer Roofing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc.
as 2:2014at00931
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan , National Roofing Industry Supplemental Pension Plan , Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Fryer Roofing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
