Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DEL ROSARIO v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSARIO v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01565
Petitioner:
NELSON JOSE DEL ROSARIO
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ROSARIO-DELGADO v. LAPPIN
as 1:2008cv01291
Petitioner:
LUIS A. ROSARIO-DELGADO
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edward Poole, et al v. David Bury, et al
as 08-5115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edward Craig Poole, Rosario Andrade Del Sol, Avelino Valdez Vasquez and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Richard Patrick
Defendant - Appellee:
David C. Bury, Frank R. Zapata, Cindy K. Jorgenson and others
Edward Poole, et al v. David Bury, et al
as 08-5112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Edward Craig Poole, Rosario Andrade Del Sol, Avelino Valdez Vasquez and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wendell David Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
David C. Bury, Frank R. Zapata, Cindy K. Jorgenson and others
Edward Poole, et al v. David Bury, et al
as 08-5083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Craig Poole
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rosario Andrade Del Sol, Avelino Valdez Vasquez, Wendell David Williams and others
Defendant - Appellee:
David C. Bury, Frank R. Zapata, Cindy K. Jorgenson and others
ROSARIO v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
NELSON JOSE DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, JANICE GALL, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE et al v. ROLL et al
as 1:2007cv02039
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CRAIG POOLE, ROSARIO ANDRADE DEL SOL, AVELINO VALDEZ VASQUEZ and others
Defendant:
JOHN M. ROLL, DAVID C. BURY, FRANK R. ZAPATA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
