Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Spracklin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Hayley Rose Spracklin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bertram et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04177
Plaintiff:
Steven Bertram and Rose Bertram
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whelan et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02899
Plaintiff:
Rose Whelan and John Whelan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGuirk IV et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01978
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAM MCGUIRK IV and SAMANTHA ROSE BAINTER-MCGUIRK
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rose
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tapia-Nabazas v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Rose Tapia-Nabazas
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01187
Plaintiff:
Rose Harris
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Capobianco v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
ROSE L. CAPOBIANCO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendoza v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Rose Mendoza
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
