Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Humana, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01642
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. doing business as EAP and Work-Life Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. NextAssure Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02189
Defendant:
Akhtar Hassan, Asim Ashary, NextAssure Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc. and Ryoo Dental, Inc. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Ryoo Dental
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Pristine Dental Supplies, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00606
Defendant:
Mohamed Salahuddin, Pristine Dental Supplies, Inc., Mosammat Parvin Akhter and others
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc. and Ryoo Dental, Inc. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Ryoo Dental
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Allianz Transportation, Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Allianz Transportation, Inc. and Vahram Poladyan
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. I V Support Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00443
Defendant:
George R Davis, I V Support Systems, Inc. and Todd Kehrli
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Dentsply Sirona, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01932
Defendant:
Dentsply Sirona, Inc. and Endoco Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Darby Dental Supply, LLC
as 8:2017cv00233
Defendant:
Darby Dental Supply, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
RYOO DENTAL, INC. v. DARBY DENTAL SUPPLY, LLC
as 8:2017cv00203
Defendant:
DARBY DENTAL SUPPLY, LLC
Plaintiff:
RYOO DENTAL, INC.
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Keivan Sarraf, DDS, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00102
Defendant:
Keivan Sarraf, DDS, Inc. and Keivan Sarraf
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Ryoo Dental, Inc. v. Keivan Sarraf, DDS, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00097
Defendant:
Keivan Sarraf, DDS, Inc. and Keivan Sarraf
Plaintiff:
Ryoo Dental, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
