Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MAERSK AGENCY U.S.A., INC. v. WORLDWIDE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
MAERSK AGENCY U.S.A., INC. as agent for carrier Maersk Line A/S doing business as SAFMARINE
Defendant:
WORLDWIDE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC. doing business as UNITED AMERICAN LINE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
CARPE AIR & SEA SHIPPING, INC. et al v. MAERSK, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07798
Plaintiff:
CARPE AIR & SEA SHIPPING, INC. and BARBARA CARPE
Defendant:
MAERSK, INC. and SAFMARINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
BROWNING v. SAFMARINE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02436
Plaintiff:
KEITH BROWNING
Defendant:
SAFMARINE, INC. , SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES, N.V. , MAERSK LINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY et al v. M/V SAFMARINE CAVALLA et al
as 2:2010cv00897
Plaintiff:
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY and BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, LLC.
Defendant:
M/V SAFMARINE CAVALLA, SAFMARINE, SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY v. M/V SAFMARINE ANGOLA, et al
as 2:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY and BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, LLC.
Defendant:
M/V SAFMARINE ANGOLA, SAFMARINE, SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY et al v. M/V SAFMARINE SOYO et al
as 2:2010cv00420
Plaintiff:
BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY and BLOMMER CHOCOLATE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, LLC
Defendant:
M/V SAFMARINE SOYO, SAFMARINE, SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
ZIPPY INTERNATIONAL TRADING, INC. et al v. SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES, N.V. et al
as 2:2008cv03311
Plaintiff:
ZIPPY INTERNATIONAL TRADING, INC. and DITCO, INC.
Defendant:
SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES, N.V., SEAMATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and M/V MAERSK DORTIMUND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
