Cases 71 - 80 of 133
CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 1:2013cv00733
Plaintiff:
CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and SCR PHARMATOP
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC. and Peninsula Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Counter_claimant:
SANDOZ INC.
Counter_defendant:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 1:2012cv07907
Plaintiff:
SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. SANDOZ, INC.
as 3:2012cv06784
Plaintiff:
ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 2:2012cv06077
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MSD INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PFIZER INC. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv03880
Plaintiff:
PFIZER INC. , WYETH LLC , WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. SANDOZ INC.
as 3:2012cv03289
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC. et al v. SANDOZ INC.
as 2:2012cv02494
Plaintiff:
TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Defendant:
SANDOZ INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
