Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Valentine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06257
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Valentine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hickey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06197
Plaintiff:
Philip Scott Hickey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Suppes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Scott Raymond Suppes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Scott Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Elterman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Scott Elterman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Day v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Day
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wood v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
Scott Lee Wood
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hosken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Scott David Hosken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ahrens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06419
Plaintiff:
Scott Ahrens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitchell, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv06428
Plaintiff:
Alvin Scott Mitchell and Alvin Scott Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
