Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davis v. Hassell et al
as 1:2015cv05277
Petitioner:
Rawl D Davis
Respondent:
Chief/Warden Scott Hassell, Jeh C. Johnson, Field Director David Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Julien v. Hassell
as 1:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
Mario Julien
Respondent:
Scott Hassell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashman v. Hassell
as 1:2014cv04312
Petitioner:
William St. Elmo Ashman
Respondent:
Chief Scott Hassell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickley v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv04830
Petitioner:
Lionel Rickley
Respondent:
Eric B. Holder, James Johnson, George H. Wind and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phillip v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv02330
Petitioner:
Ervin Lenroy Phillip
Respondent:
Phillip Miller and Scott Hassell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tomlinson v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv05622
Respondent:
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Scott Hassell and others
Petitioner:
Ernest Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv05175
Petitioner:
Neil Roberts
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Philip T. Miller, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv05190
Petitioner:
Omar Orlando Jackson
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Philip T. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv04956
Petitioner:
Jaime Flores
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder , Philip T. Miller , Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv04731
Petitioner:
Sasenarine Singh
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Philip T. Miller, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
