Cases 1 - 10 of 551
BRANNON v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv59050
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
as 5:2011cv53990
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. AMERICAN MARITIME CREWING
as 2:2011cv55331
Plaintiff:
TYRONE J. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
AMERICAN MARITIME CREWING , AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., BAY TANKERS INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , ANCHOR PACKING CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARDING v. SEA LAND SERVICE INC., et al
as 5:2011cv53996
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE INC., ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BYRD v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv58549
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. BYRD
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
STEPHENS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59120
Plaintiff:
LEROY STEPHENS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56519
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TAYLOR v. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv59098
Defendant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VACCA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59165
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. VACCA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
YOUNG v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59521
Plaintiff:
ELLIS YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , JAMES WALKER MFG. CO., EG&G SEALOL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
