Cases 1 - 10 of 37
McCallon v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles D. McCallon
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Sears Holdings Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 4:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Annette Abbott
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sears Roebuck and Co v. AIX Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Defendant:
AIX Inc and Spirit Delivery and Distribution Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Denmel Holdings et al v. IXT Systems International et al
as 2:2013cv00888
Plaintiff:
Denmel Holdings and Melanie Reah
Defendant:
IXT Systems International, JS Karaoke, DOK Solution and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Garcia v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Mary Garcia
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caldwell v. Sears Holding Management Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Debbie Severance Caldwell
Defendant:
Sears Holding Management Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Adams v. Sears Roebuck and Co.,
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Roger Adams
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.,
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330 IRS: Notice & Opportunity for Hearing Before Levy
Sosko v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sosko
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
