Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HAWKINS et al v. AMERICAN MAIL LINES et al
as 2:2011cv33883
Plaintiff: KENNETH D. HAWKINS and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: AMERICAN MAIL LINES, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED, GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES and others
Thirdparty_defendant: A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY , FORTY-EIGHT INSULATIONS INCORPORATED, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GUIDEN v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES et al
as 2:2011cv33931
Plaintiff: THOMAS GUIDEN
Defendant: AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES , AMERICAN VIKING CORPORATION, CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , T AND N PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARTEL et al v. A.H. BULL AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37955
Plaintiff: WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: A.H. BULL AND COMPANY, ALCOA , ARMY TRANSPORT SERVICE and others
Movant: THOMPSON, HINE AND FLORY
Thirdparty_plaintiff: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant: ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, BABCOCK AND WILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. A.H. BULL AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37826
Plaintiff: CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: A.H. BULL AND COMPANY, ALBANY RIVER TRANSPORT , ALCOA and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAHL et al v. AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37910
Plaintiff: NICK KAHL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION , AMERICAN PACIFIC, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC , USS PITTSBURGH FLEET and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant: GAF CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Counter_defendant: USX CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
v. MILLER et al
as 2:2009cv91192
Defendant: CREIGHTON E MILLER, CREIGHTON E MILLER, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: GULF OIL COMPANY, LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC. and AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
ThirdParty Defendant: A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
State Shipping Company Black Sea Shipping Company v. Safinat An-Najaat Shipping Company Limited
as 1:2008cv07721
Plaintiff: State Shipping Company Black Sea Shipping Company and State Shipping Company Black Sea Shipping Company
Defendant: Safinat An-Najaat Shipping Company Limited
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
GLAZE v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61926
Plaintiff: RICHARD GLAZE, RICHARD GLAZE and RICHARD GLAZE
Defendant: ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC., CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, A.H. BULL STEAMSHIP COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: GARLOCK, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BONA et al v. SEAS SHIPPING COMPANY, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv61925
Plaintiff: REGINA BONA and REGINA BONA
Defendant: A.H. BULL STEAMSHIP COMPANY, SEAS SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION OF NEW YORK
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MAULTSBY v. MARVEN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv62698
Plaintiff: MORRIS J. MAULTSBY
Defendant: MARVEN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, ORE NAVIGATION CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?