Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chae v. Yellen
as 22-2017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYUNGMIN CHAE
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET YELLEN, Secretary of the Treasury, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. US
as 20-2145
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES R. STEUART, in his official capacity as Chief Intellectual Property Rights and Restricted Merchandise Branch, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection., JUAN J. PORRAS, in his official capacity as Director of Machinery Center of Excellence and Expertise of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Platt v. Wolf
as 20-1206
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
DAVID B. PLATT, aka Brant E.
NU-WAY CONCRETE V DHS
as 11-1171
Appellee:
Janet A. Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security
Appellant:
Nu-Way Concrete Company, Inc.
BAKER V DHS
as 09-1533
Defendant-Appellee:
Janet A. Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Timothy Peter Baker
RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE V DHS
as 06-1055
Appellee:
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security and Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security
Appellant:
Richlin Security Service Company, Richlin Security Service Company and Richlin Security Service Company
PUGLIA ENGINEER V DHS
as 05-1371
Appellee:
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security
Appellant:
PUGLIA ENGINEERING, INC.
RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE V DHS
as 05-1085
Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security
Appellant:
RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE COMPANY
FALLS MANUFACTURING V DHS
as 04-1551
Appellant:
FALLS MANUFACTURING, INC.
Appellee:
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security
RICHLIN SECURITY V HOMELAND SECURIT
as 03-1344
Appellant:
RICHLIN SECURITY SERVICE COMPANY
Appellee:
TOM RIDGE, Secretary of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
