Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KLM & M, LLC et al v. VCP 2 Augusta, P.C. et al
as 1:2014cv00216
Plaintiff:
KLM & M, LLC , Vein Care Pavilion of the South, LLC and The Estate of Keith L. Davis
Defendant:
VCP 2 Augusta, P.C. , VCP 2 Atlanta, P.C. , Mary Anne Roth and others
Counter_claimant:
VCP 2 Atlanta, P.C. , Kelly Vann , Mary Anne Roth and others
Counter_defendant:
KLM & M, LLC , The Estate of Keith L. Davis and Vein Care Pavilion of the South, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Coach, Inc. et al v. Moore
as 5:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Teresa J. Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach, Inc. et al v. Hubert Keller, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Hubert Keller, Inc., Charles Hubert Keller Sr., Charles Hubert Keller Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Coach, Inc. et al v. Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc., Yi Mu Chen, Song Qing Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Coach, Inc. et al v. Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Peking Chinese Super Buffet, Inc., Yi Mu Chen, Song Qing Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Walker et al
as 4:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Hershel Walker, Renaissance Man Food Services, LLC. and H. Walker Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Hershel Walker's Smokehouse & Pizzeria and John Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Textron Innovations Inc. et al v. JH Global Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Textron Innovations Inc. and E-Z-GO
Defendant:
JH Global Services, Inc., Golf Car Trader, LLC and Mountain Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
