Cases 41 - 50 of 70
BRECKER v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70660
Plaintiff:
DELORES M. BRECKER
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , CHRYSLER LLC , CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KROSKE v. UNION CARBIDE et al
as 2:2009cv66764
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. KROSKE
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE, UNION CARBIDE, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MONTGOMERY v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv64624
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FLACK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61877
Plaintiff:
LEONARD FLACK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRIESACHER v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61874
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BRIESACHER
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHAW v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61886
Plaintiff:
ORVAL SHAW
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SELKING v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61885
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SELKING
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BAKER v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61875
Plaintiff:
FRANKLYN CHAVEZ
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHEETS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61887
Plaintiff:
GERROLD SHEETS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ESPINOZ v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv61876
Plaintiff:
LUIS ESPINOZ
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
