Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3M Company, Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc, Alcoa, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Hobart Corporation et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation , Kelsey-Hayes Company and NCR Corporation
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., DAP Products, Inc. , GlaxsoSmithKline, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
PNC Bank, NA v. Robin Springs Acquisitions, LP et al
as 1:2008cv00725
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, NA and PNC Bank, NA
Defendant:
Robin Springs Acquisitions, LP and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
State Of Ohio v. Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 2:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
State Of Ohio
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, American Cyanamid Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
