Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Munoz v. RDO Equipment Company
as 24-2356
Plaintiff:
SIMON MUNOZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public
Defendant:
RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Simon and Simon, PC, et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.
as 24-1703
Plaintiff:
SIMON AND SIMON, PC and VIP DENTAL SPAS
Defendant:
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Diego-Pedro, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1556
Petitioner:
MARCOS DIEGO-PEDRO and DIEGO EDUARDO DIEGO-SIMON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Simon, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1025
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SIMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DAVID BARBER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANA BLOCK and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and PAUL MIYAMOTO, In his official capacity as San Francisco Sheriff
Dos Santos-De Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-829
Petitioner:
SIMONE DOS SANTOS-DE SOUZA and MARIA ANTONIA LIMA DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kumar, et al. v. Koester, et al.
as 23-4363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNIL KUMAR and PRAVEEN SINHA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University, LARRY ADAMSON, DIANA AGUILAR-CRUZ and others
Simon and Simon, PC, et al. v. Align Technology, Inc.
as 23-4153
Respondent:
SIMON AND SIMON, PC, doing business as City Smiles and VIP DENTAL SPAS, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Petitioner:
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Simon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3997
Petitioner:
ANNOVE SIMON, NATALIE JEAN and SOFIA SIMON-JEAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
