Cases 1 - 10 of 56
ENLOP v. HAKE et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ENLOP
Defendant:
JEFF HAKE, CHRIS CLASS, SIMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIAL v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
SHOUNDELLE DONTIA DIAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, BRADLEY T. GROSS, ANGELA P. DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARROCA v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARROCA
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS R. KANE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC HOLDER, CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. HOGAN
as 1:2012cv01031
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, MICHAEL RYAN, GEORGE LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2012cv00509
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL A. STEWART
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
MARTIN WARD
Defendant:
W. TAYLOR and SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2011cv02205
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CROCKETT v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv02124
Plaintiff:
WARDELL CROCKETT, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
