Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Matthews v. New York State Workers Compensation Board
as 23-7568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR MATTHEWS
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK STATE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD, JUDGE, Claims Unit, MR SNIDER, State Ins. Fund and others
Aiello v. Brown
as 21-987
Defendant / Appellee:
Howard Brown, HiTouch Nashville LLC, Andrew Kovach and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael J. Palmer, Paul Swistak, Stuart Kaffee and others
Defendant:
Steven Chambers
Sullivan v. Snider
as 21-916
Plaintiff:
Robert Sullivan
Counter Claimant:
David B. Snider and Robin A. Snider
United States of America v. Gjuraj
as 21-358
Defendant:
Mike Peters, Dondon Fletcher, AKA Yellow, David Karp and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Isni Gjuraj
Santos v. Wood
as 20-3549
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Doe #1, NP, Deborah Geer, PA, Anthony J. Annucci, AC and others
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sgt, J. Hartman, C.O., Christopher M. Learn, Sgt and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Francisco Santos
Aiello et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv09647
Defendant:
Sanjai Bhonsle, Karen Reidy, Michael Cornell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drapkin, Michael J. Palmer, Lawrence G. Kaye and H. Anne Kaye 1996 Revocable Living Trust and others
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-5224
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-3115
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
Martin v. JPMorgan Chase et al
as 1:2009mc00281
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Martin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase, Capital One Bank, Sterling Bank and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
