Cases 31 - 40 of 498
ANDERSON v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv02918
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TAMMY A. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAMADOU v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02755
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
AICHA HAMADOU
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
SHAW v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv02695
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MELODY L. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KULIK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02344
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DAVID A KULIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MYLAND v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv02454
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. MYLAND
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JENNINGS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01953
Plaintiff:
TARRELLE RONALD THOMAS and ANNETTE JENNINGS
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MCADAMS v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv01905
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GROTSKY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01875
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALAN GROTSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHRISTOFFERSON et al v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv01497
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. CHRISTOFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
