Cases 61 - 70 of 867
JEWELL V. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2020cv02375
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DIANA SUE JEWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KULIK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02344
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DAVID A KULIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MYLAND v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv02454
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. MYLAND
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KICHLINE v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv02151
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TASHA KICHLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
STEWART-BROWN v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN LOUISE STEWART-BROWN
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Allen v. Saul
as 2:2020cv02016
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Quentin Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lamoureux v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00665
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Colt Russell Lamoureux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CONNER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01952
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY L CONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JENNINGS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01953
Plaintiff:
TARRELLE RONALD THOMAS and ANNETTE JENNINGS
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
