Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Mccoy v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv04729
Plaintiff:
Latreasha Mccoy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Teh-Chung Hong v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Teh-Chung Hong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ramirez v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv03652
Plaintiff:
Ceaser Ramirez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Adams v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv02089
Plaintiff:
Garrian Adams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nodoline v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2021cv05129
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew John Nodoline
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Girard v. Saul
as 3:2021cv02557
Plaintiff:
Destry B. Girard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
De La Torre v. Saul
as 3:2021cv02106
Plaintiff:
Anthony De La Torre
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv09305
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDonald v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv06968
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rosado v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv06449
Plaintiff:
Yvette Rosado
Defendant:
Andrew Saul Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
