Cases 71 - 80 of 364
JOLLY v. GEIB et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
MAKETA JOLLY
Defendant:
GLEN GEIB, JOSH LITCHBLAU, JOANNE LEONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAIDIAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Said Saidian
Not Classified By Court:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
OLIPHANT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. OLIPHANT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FAVORS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
APRIL FAVORS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03370
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCEACHIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03297
Plaintiff:
KATRINA MCEACHIN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PINKNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv03147
Plaintiff:
EMERY FREEMONT PINKNEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FREEMAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03140
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FREEMAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLAIR v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03089
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA BLAIR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ROGERS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03059
Plaintiff:
YAMISE K. ROGERS and YAMISE ROGERS
Not Classified By Court:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
