Cases 101 - 110 of 1,054
GARY v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63306
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARY
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GINGERELLA et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63262
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. GINGERELLA and FRANCES GINGERELLA
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. , FIBERBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EADS et al v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv62994
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EADS and CAROL EADS
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. , H.K. PORTER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABEGA v. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv62996
Plaintiff:
BONNIE LABEGA
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. , H.K. PORTER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUNDOCK v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63301
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BUNDOCK
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EARL v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63343
Plaintiff:
EDMOND EARL
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULVIHILL v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62558
Plaintiff:
MYRL MULVIHILL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLOUTIER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63255
Plaintiff:
LEO N. CLOUTIER and ADELINA M. CLOUTIER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. , FIBERBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAWLOWSKI v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63284
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
PAWLOWSKI
ROBAR et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63179
Plaintiff:
FLOYD ROBAR and GLADYS ROBAR
Defendant:
GAF CORP., EASTERN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., CATHERINE MOHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
