Cases 61 - 70 of 1,054
KIRKLAND v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63293
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIRKLAND
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OSIPER v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63340
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER OSIPER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARQUETTE v. JOHNS-MANIVLLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62459
Plaintiff:
HERMAN MARQUETTE
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANIVLLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63332
Plaintiff:
EVERETT BAKER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'DONNEL v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63309
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
O'DONNEL
GENCARELLA v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., et al
as 2:2011cv62538
Plaintiff:
PASQUALE GENCARELLA
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LITTLETON et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62974
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LITTLETON and JEAN LITTLETON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP , PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOX, et al. v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62500
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FOX and LORRAINE FOX
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRUM et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62752
Plaintiff:
JOHN DRUM and DAWN DRUM
Defendant:
GAF CORP., CAREY CANADA, INC. , GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TWIGG v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63304
Plaintiff:
JOHN TWIGG
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
