Cases 71 - 80 of 1,054
KAMINSKI et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv62871
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KAMINSKI and MARY KAMINSKI
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGINS v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63329
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. HIGGINS
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLYNN v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62466
Plaintiff:
LAURENCE FLYNN
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAIOLO v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62976
Plaintiff:
GARIBALDI MAIOLO
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP. , PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOSTON v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63303
Plaintiff:
BOSTON
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
BOSTON v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63303
Plaintiff:
EDNA BOSTON
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELTIER et al v. SHOOK & FLETCHER INSULATION CO. et al
as 2:2011cv64196
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PELTIER, JR. and JUDITH PELTIER
Defendant:
SHOOK & FLETCHER INSULATION CO., SEPCO CORP., CAREY CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOSTYLA v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63277
Plaintiff:
RITA GOSTYLA
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUNDOCK v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63301
Plaintiff:
BUNDOCK
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
FYFE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63261
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. FYFE and MARIE E. FYFE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. , FIBERBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
