Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Aggrey v. State of Utah
as 2:2018cv00904
Defendant:
State of Utah
Plaintiff:
Dominic Taban Aggrey
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Tran v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv03029
Plaintiff:
Ngoc Kim Tran
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Perkins v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv02487
Plaintiff:
David L Perkins
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Van Vorous v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01358
Plaintiff:
Shelley Van Vorous
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Brasel v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03290
Plaintiff:
Maria Ella Brasel
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Stilson v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Stilson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Chiles v. Colvin et al
as 1:2013cv03255
Plaintiff:
Valarie D Chiles
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02717
Plaintiff:
Rodney P. Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01927
Plaintiff:
Billy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mengesha v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01883
Plaintiff:
Izra H. Mengesha
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
