Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Northwestern Memorial Hospital et al v. Becerra
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Western Reserve Hospital, LLC, Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital and others
Petitioner:
Memorial Medical Center
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00419
Not Yet Classified:
NEA BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CRITTENDEN, BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL UNION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH GROSSE POINTE HOSPITAL, COREWELL HEALTH WILLIAM BEAUMONT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, NORTH ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER fka ELIZA COFFEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANDALUSIA HEALTH fka COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANDALUSIA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
University of Colorado Health, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5218
Plaintiff / Appellee:
University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital, formerly known as Memorial Hospital of Colorado Springs, Banner Heart Hospital, Banner Baywood Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Citrus HMA, LLC, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-5173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Citrus HMA, LLC, doing business as Seven Rivers Regional Medical Center, Naples HMA, LLC, doing business as Physicians Regional Medical Center, Northwest Hospital, LLC, doing business as Northwest Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL, ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
Secretary XAVIER BECERRA and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03123
Plaintiff:
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03076
Plaintiff:
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL, INC. and CANDLER HOSPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
