Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Star Property Nakatomi, LLC v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv23517
Plaintiff:
Star Property Nakatomi, LLC
Defendant:
Arch Specialty Insurance Company, United Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy Number: VETGV06026210
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Black Star Properties, LLC v. Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
as 0:2023cv61570
Plaintiff:
Black Star Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Caplan v. MONEY MART, INC. et al
as 9:2019cv80288
Defendant:
STAR PROPERTY XVIII, LLC, MONEY MART, INC. and MONEY MART, INC. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as CHECK CASHING STORE
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barberi v. Sushi Leno World Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv21613
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Sushi Leno World Cuisine, Inc. and Star Property XI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Star Property Investments, Corp v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 0:2014cv61519
Plaintiff:
Star Property Investments, Corp
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emerald Star Casino & Resorts, Inc. et al v. Emerald Star Casino - Natchez, LLC et al
as 8:2007cv01408
Plaintiff:
Emerald Star Casino & Resorts, Inc., Emerald Star Properties, LLC and Charles E. Cato
Defendant:
Emerald Star Casino - Natchez, LLC, Big River Enterprises, LLC, William J. Bayba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
