Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. South Bend Indiana States Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Smith
Defendant:
South Bend Indiana States Attorneys Office, Kenneth Biggins, State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayodele v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2021cv50187
Defendant:
Jason Douglas Bunch, Natalie Kay Carpenter and State of Indiana
Plaintiff:
Bode Ayodele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections and State of Indiana
Plaintiff:
Pearson Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Kankakee Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2019cv02196
Petitioner:
William Evans
Respondent:
State of Indiana and Kankakee Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Konrath v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2016cv09541
Plaintiff:
Gregory Konrath
Defendant:
State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rust v. Levenhagen et al
as 1:2012cv10324
Petitioner:
Ricky L. Rust
Respondent:
Mark Levenhagen and Attorney General of the State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. State of Indiana
as 1:2012cv08514
Petitioner:
Henry Gibbs, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bacot v. Knight, et al.,
as 1:2008cv07035
Petitioner:
William B. Bacot, III
Respondent:
Wendy Knight and Attorney General of the State of Indiana
Plaintiff:
William B. Bacot, III
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
