Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bridgewater Products, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv22181
Defendant: Detroit Diesel, Washtenaw County Proseutors Office, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff: Co-Patent Owners US #6,889,615, et al. and Bridgewater Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Robert Rawson v. State of Ohio, et al
as 17-12361
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT DAVID RAWSON, a person
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Bridgewater Products Inc., Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615 v. Penske et al
as 1:2015cv24733
Plaintiff: Bridgewater Products Inc., Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615
Defendant: Roger S. Penske, Detroit Diesel, Penske Truck Leasing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgewater Products, Inc. Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615 v. Penske et al
as 0:2015cv62697
Plaintiff: Bridgewater Products, Inc. Co-Patent Owners US 6,889,615
Defendant: Roger S. Penske, Detroit Diesel, Penske Truck Leasing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America ex rel. et al v. Omnicare, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mi00018
Plaintiff: United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Delaware ex rel. and others
Defendant: Omnicare, Inc., Omnicare Pharmacy of Texas 2, LP, Omnicare Pharmacy of Florida, LP and others
Movant: Altacare Corporation
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Re El et al v. State of Michigan
as 1:2011mi00017
Plaintiff: Jaame Amun Re El and Jaame Amun Re El Holding Corp.
Defendant: State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Hairston v. State of Michigan
as 1:2010cv03751
Plaintiff: Julie Hairston
Defendant: State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?