Cases 31 - 40 of 40
BARNES et al v. City of Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10689
Plaintiff:
KIRA BARNES , E.B. and P.B.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RAINEY et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10682
Plaintiff:
LONEISHA RAINEY , R.M. , N.T. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jackson et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10681
Plaintiff:
Kristy Jackson , J.J. and O.C.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Warren et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10679
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Warren , C.W. , L.R. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Evans et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10677
Plaintiff:
Aneisha Evans , A.F. , G.F. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Upchurch et al v. City of Flint, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2017cv10400
Plaintiff:
Darlene Upchurch and A.B.
Defendant:
City of Flint, a municipal corporation, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sirls et al v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2017cv10342
Plaintiff:
Marlana Sirls , Felix Sirils , A. S.1. and others
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Richard Dale Snyder, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 2:2014cv12567
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Rick Snyder, Karen Johnson and others
Sulton et al v. Child Protective Services of State of Michigan
as 2:2012cv14642
Plaintiff:
Ametra Sulton and HS
Defendant:
Child Protective Services of State of Michigan
v. Michigan
as 2:2009cv12590
Defendant:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
