Cases 11 - 20 of 63
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Ani Gharibian, et al v. Valley Campus Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 21-56253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANI GHARIBIAN, Relator; ex rel United States of America
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY CAMPUS PHARMACY, INC., DBA TNH Advanced Speciality Pharmacy, DIPLOMAT PHARMACY, INC. and OPTUMRX, INC.
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv04155
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Holdings, LLC, Frontier Communications Corporation, Frontier Communications Intermediate, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, The People of the State of California, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-15420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent:
STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al
as 20-56280
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
