Cases 1 - 4 of 4
The United States Of America et al vs Bayer Diagnostics Corp.
as 1:2011cv00181
Defendant:
Bayer Diagnostics Corp, Davita Inc., Dva Laboratories Services and others
Relator:
Rey C. Patricia
Plaintiff:
The Common Wealth Of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth Of Virginia, The District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al.
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party:
Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America, ex rel. Joseph Piacentile v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 2:2004cv03983
Defendant:
Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc., Amgen Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Relator:
Kevin Kilcoyne, Joseph Piacentile and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
